<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>耳机 on 知音聆听</title><link>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/categories/%E8%80%B3%E6%9C%BA/</link><description>Recent content in 耳机 on 知音聆听</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>Informed Listening</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/categories/%E8%80%B3%E6%9C%BA/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>平滑的倾斜曲线，并非放之四海而皆准的统一目标</title><link>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/a-smooth-slope-is-not-one-universal-target/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/a-smooth-slope-is-not-one-universal-target/</guid><description>在不同类型的换能器之间，一条平滑的下倾曲线或许是一个有用的参考，但正确的倾斜幅度取决于每种设备如何与听众、房间和反射声相耦合。</description></item><item><title>如何解读围绕耳机测量的争论</title><link>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/reading-headphone-measurement-arguments/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/reading-headphone-measurement-arguments/</guid><description>耳机测量是有用的地图，但这张地图取决于所用的测量系统、目标曲线、佩戴贴合度，以及你到底在问什么问题。</description></item><item><title>失真，何时才真正成为一个听感问题</title><link>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/when-distortion-becomes-a-listening-question/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.informedlistening.com/zh/articles/when-distortion-becomes-a-listening-question/</guid><description>失真的可闻性取决于电平、频率、曲目内容、听者本身，以及失真的具体类型——而不是取决于某一个单一的百分比数值。</description></item></channel></rss>